Kratos helps supports Zumwalt Class Destroyer for the Navy

Beginning in 2006, Kratos, thought its Gichner subsidiary, was awarded contracts for the design, engineering and production of Electronic Modular Enclosures (EMEs) from Wenzlau Engineering and Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems in support of the U.S. Navy DDG 1000 Zumwalt Class Destroyer and Self Defense Test Ship programs.

Situational Overview

DDG 1000 Zumwalt Class DestroyerUnder the U.S. Navy's DDG 1000 Detail Design and Integration contract awarded in 2005, Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems (IDS) serves as the prime mission systems equipment integrator for all of the leading-edge electronic and combat systems for the Zumwalt-class destroyer program. Working with the Navy and a team of industry leaders, IDS is leading the effort to transform the Navy's ship requirements to reality. Raytheon IDS was tasked with providing new cost-effective innovations to modernize the approach to shipbuilding and mission equipment integration. As a subcontractor to IDS, Kratos was selected to provide design, engineering, manufacturing and technical support for the development of Electronic Modular Enclosures, which enable reductions in ship integration costs by streamlining shipboard combat system installation, integration and testing.

DDG 1000 Zumwalt Class Destroyer

Kratos was tasked with:

The Kratos team has been instrumental in providing services and resources to support program goals and budgetary requirements.

Kratos Solution

Because of its expertise in design and production of tactical military enclosures, Kratos was able to provide the following design, production, testing and support services for the DDG 1000 program:

Empowering Benefits

Kratos’ quality engineering services, production and technical support have contributed to the innovations and efficiencies inherent in this design approach for DDG 1000, including:

Kratos worked with Raytheon engineering and program management to minimize cost growth during the complex design to manufacturing transition and throughout the manufacturing program by implementing continuous improvement initiatives.  These initiatives were successful in minimizing production, test and delivery schedule delays.

Print